.
Medical Update:
Medical Update:
Thank you for the kind suggestions of home remedies in the comments box last week. Before trying them I went to an ear-nose-and-throat specialist yesterday and he examined me
for ten minutes and told me that I have a slight blockage of the Eustachian tube
in my left ear. Although it’s nothing serious, it could take a few more weeks for
that stuffy feeling to clear up. He gave me some samples of nasal spray to help Mother Nature along. I hope that this will be the last you’ll have to hear about my middle ear.
ON FINCHES' BEAKS
By sheer coincidence I’ve
been reading the Pulitzer Prize-winning book The Beak of the Finch by science writer Jonathan Weiner (1995), that centers on the story of two scientists, Peter and Rosemary Grant, who spent twenty
years studying finches on a tiny remote islet in the Galapagos. It’s one of those books that give you a whole new way of looking at the world.
The Grants' incredibly meticulous measurements
of everything (e.g. actually counting the numbers of various seeds in random
square-meter plots of ground, and banding and measuring every single finch on
the islet for twenty years) revealed, when the data was crunched in a computer, that Darwin didn’t know the strength of his own theory. The Grants detail how
the beaks of the three species of finches change in response to the kinds and
quantity of seeds available. They watched the beaks change not over eons or millennia
but in a couple of short years.
They showed that evolution is
not, as Darwin thought, just something in the distant past, nor is it an imperceptibly slow process
that can only be observed from the perspective of spotty fossil records. We can
see it happening, ebbing back and forth and in all sorts of intricate ways.
Lots of evolutionary biologists routinely demonstrate every day the various principles of evolution at work both in
the wild and in laboratories. One scientist, Martin Taylor, was being paid by
American Cyanamid to observe and record the rapid evolution of Heliothis virescens, a moth that has
been decimating cotton crops in the South for decades. By analyzing the
DNA of moths from several states each month he has come to understand exactly
how the moths evolve a resistance to a new pesticide – they can do so in the
space of a single growing season -- and notes “The moths have become almost
absolutely resistant to all pesticides.”
UNBELIEVABLE CREATION
So there I am reading this
book as I sit waiting in the doctor’s office because of a slight blockage in
the tube that allows the pressure in the middle ear to match the ambient atmospheric
pressure. We certainly are “wonderfully made,” aren’t we? I suppose that the finches in the Galapagos have Eustachian tubes, too. I'm not wondering so much about how we all happen to have gotten Eustachian tubes, I'm just in awe of the simple fact that we have them at all.
Meditating over the years on
the beautiful account of creation in Genesis has helped me to
Michelangelo's version of the Big Bang |
appreciate the
truth that God is the creator of all things in heaven and on earth. But for me
it’s become much more a source of wonderment to realize that the billions of
DNA genes and chromosomes in us living creatures are able to do all the things
they do, and that the tiniest accidental variation in a chromosome can result
in immense changes if it proves helpful for the survival of that individual and
thus is passed on as an adaptation to some environmental stressor such as a
pesticide or a drought. Creation is continuing full tilt today.
BIBLE BELT IRONY
I used to get asked (no so frequently nowadays) if as a
Catholic I’m allowed to believe in the theory of evolution. These days, though, no one has asked if I'm allowed to believe that houseflies and moths have somehow become resistant to every known pesticide. No one has asked me if I am allowed to believe in the observable facts of evolutionary biology all around me.
Heliothis virescens believes in Darwin |
There's an ironic twist to this question in the experience of Martin Taylor, the scientist who is monitoring the
evolving resistance of those moths in the "Cotton Belt," which is also known as “the Bible Belt.” He observes,
Cotton growers are having to
deal with these pests in the very states whose legislatures are so hostile to
the theory of evolution. Because it is evolution itself that they are
struggling against in their fields each season. These people are trying to ban
the teaching of evolution while their own cotton crops are failing because of
evolution. How can you be a Creationist farmer any more?
IMHO, the awe at being fearfully and wonderfully made cannot help but be followed by a deep gratitude towards the One who made us. Thank you for a delightful meditation on a tiny piece of the human body that does not come to our attention unless it is ailing. Sometimes I become oblivious to the walking wonder that I am, and forget to cultivate sincere thankfulness to God for such things as Eustachian tubes.
ReplyDeleteAnd thank you for the tongue-in-cheek observation regarding pesticide-resistant Bible-belt moths evolving in Creationist cotton fields. God certainly has a sense of humor, doesn't He?
I'm reading Fossils, Finches and Fuegians! Beaks, October 1835. CMJE
ReplyDelete